Predictability and Accuracy between 3D Virtual Surgical Planning and Actual Outcomes in Orthognathic Surgery| Stephypublishers
Modern Research in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - (MRPRS)| Stephy Publishers
Abstract
Introduction: We are
living a paradigm shift in orthognathic surgery. Several tools and
technological advances are being implemented to help improve surgical
experience and to offer better functional and aesthetical results. Virtual
surgical planning is a revolutionary tool which helps us design the surgical
plan preoperatively and establish a surgical protocol specifically designed for
that patient. In this study, our goal is to validate the predictability of
virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery, comparing the final results
with the virtual plan. Material and methods: We performed an ICP based super
imposition of 3D models of the virtual planning preoperatively designed and the
3D model of the postoperative CBCT using free software (Slicer) in patients who
underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. The results of the super imposition
were saved on the postoperative model and presented as a color-coded map. This
was generated as a .vtk file that was exported to another free software that
displayed the difference in mm in relevant cephalometric points (point A, point
B, pogonion, left and right gonion and first upper molars) in the three axis
(x, y and z) between the postoperative result and the virtual plan. Then, we
registered these results for all patients and analysed these data. Results: A
total of 41 patients were included. The median of the differences in mm between
virtual planning and postoperative results were less than 1mm for all
cephalometric points, except for both gonion, where greater than 1mm
differences were found in the mediolateral (horizontal) direction. For the rest
of landmarks, the highest differences were found at A point and pogonion in the
anteroposterior direction (0,83mm and 0,78mm, respectively). Conclusions: We
found overall small and tolerable differences (<1mm) between the planned movements and the postoperative results. The highest were found at the gonion in the mediolateral direction and mandibular rami, which could be explained by the torque of the proximal segment. The differences in A point and pogonion in the anteroposterior direction were the highest among the rest, which may be related to inaccuracy of the splint in this direction.
Keywords: Predictability, Orthognathic surgery, Virtual planning
Introduction
Success in orthognathic surgery depends not only on the technical aspects of the operation but to a larger extent on the formulation of a precise surgical plan, consistency and capability of achieving predictable, stable results.1
New 3D tools have lately arisen to
help us improve accuracy and results, such as virtual surgical planning, which has long been applied in craniofacial surgery but less so
in maxillofacial surgery.2
Because of current improvement in imag
ing and software, computer-assisted surgery has been increasingly
used in orthognathic surgery to improve surgical outcomes.
Comments
Post a Comment